WARNING - By their nature, text files cannot include scanned images and tables. 
The process of converting documents to text only, can cause formatting changes and 
misinterpretation of the contents can sometimes result. Wherever possible you 
should refer to the pdf version of this document.


CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY 

Title: REPORT ON CALLED-IN PLANNING APPLICATION 

Prepared by: NEIL STEWART, PLANNING OFFICER 
(DEVELOPMENT CONTROL) 

DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED: FULL PLANNING PERMISSION FOR 
ERECTION OF WATER BOTTLING STORAGE BUILDING, DEESIDE WATER 
COMPANY LTD. PANNANICH WELLS, BALLATER 

REFERENCE: 05/414/CP 

APPLICANT: DEESIDE WATER COMPANY LTD., THE STABLES, PANNANICH WELLS, 
BALLATER 

DATE CALLED-IN: 23 SEPTEMBER 2005 

Fig. 1 - Ordnance Survey map showing the location of the Water Bottling Plant,
Pannanich Wells, Ballater.
(not available in text format) 


SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSAL 

1. The premises of the Deeside Water Company are located on the South 
Deeside Road near to the Pannanich Wells Hotel, approximately 2 
miles east of Ballater. The company currently operates out of an 
existing traditional single storey converted outbuilding which is 
positioned immediately adjacent to the public road on its north side. 
The existing building is at a lower level to the road and there are two 
accesses serving the parking yard which lies on the north side of the 
building. This yard area is also used for storage purposes with 
products and materials kept in lorry trailers and in the open. Beyond 
this on the north side is a steep treed embankment which slopes down 
from the site. Although there is a more open field area to the east side, 
the surrounding slopes are mostly wooded. A burn runs down the 
slope close to the west boundary of the site. Being a tributary of the 
River Dee, it forms part of the River Dee Special Area of Conservation 
(SAC). The Pannanich Wells Hotel, which is a Category B Listed 
Building, is positioned approximately 150m to the east. The Hotel sits 
within a cleared area in the trees at a higher level to the road on the 
south side. Photographs of the site are shown below as Figs. 2 & 3. 

Fig. 2 - colour photograph showing the site viewed from the West 
(not available in full text format)

2. Following amendments, the proposal is to construct a new building 
adjoining the existing building and which is positioned mainly on the 
levelled yard/access area on the north side. The floor area of the new 
building extends to 518 sqm. It is rectangular in plan form with a 
shallow roof pitch which extends to adjoin the ridge of the existing 
building. The required width of the building means that part of it is 
required to be supported on columns where it spans over the sloping 
embankment. The finishing materials proposed are textured profiled 
metal cladding of two colours (sepia brown/terracotta) and stained 
vertical timber cladding with open joints. The building has been 
designed to retain HGV access by allowing vehicular passage through 
the building. In this respect there are two large “doors” either end. 
Some trees will be removed on the north slope. 

Fig. 3 - Colour photograph showing the site viewed from the East 
(not available in full text format)

3. The new building is to provide covered storage for empty bottles and 
packaging materials, and the finished product. In addition it will provide 
covered loading facilities for the despatch of the finished product. The 
applicants have provided some supporting information. This states that 
water for the bottling plant in the existing building flows from the wells 
at Pannanich to the existing building where it is filtered and stored in 
tanks which feed the bottling line. There is limited storage space and 
as such they use four trailers located on site to store empty bottles, 
packaging materials and the finished product. A new bottling line has 
been installed in the existing building which produces up to 25,000 
litres of finished product in a production day. The line has a prebottling 
rinser, filling machine, capper, capsuler, labeller, and shrink 
wrapping and pallet wrapping machines. It requires 5 staff to run it plus 
a production manager and fork lift driver to feed the bottles at the start 
of the line and remove and store them at the end of the line. 

4. The applicants have also stated that the business started operating on 
a very limited scale in 1996 and moved to the present building in 1998 
when a small bottling line was installed. Listings for Deeside Water 
were achieved with Safeway, Sainsbury, Tesco, Waitrose and Asda 
and the production facility has been upgraded to cope with the 
additional volumes. It is also stated that negotiations are nearing 
completion with two major export customers which will lead to a further 
increase in the level of storage required. The award of these contracts 
depends on the company upgrading the storage facility as proposed. 
One of these customers requires water in glass bottles as well as in 
plastic and they do not have sufficient storage at present to satisfy this 
demand. The company has invested £150,000 in the new bottling line 
to meet these requirements and is prepared to invest further in the new 
storage facility. At present only 7% of the product is exported but they 
expect this to increase to around 30%. The company at present has 
three full time employees plus two on job share and a further three 
part-time. On completion of the proposed facility they expect this to 
increase to ten full time and three part time. 

5. In February 2002, Aberdeenshire Council’s Marr Area Committee 
considered an officer recommendation of approval on a planning 
application for the construction of a detached building at this site. This 
application, which was for a larger building (1215sqm floor area), 
positioned on the slope on the north side was to allow for the relocation 
of the bottling line, the provision of storage space and the relocation 
and increase of office and staff accommodation. The Marr Area 
Committee approved the application and the permission was issued on 
14 February 2002. This permission remains extant. 


DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONTEXT 

National Planning Policy 

6. SPP15 (Planning for Rural Development), emphasises the 
importance of the planning system for facilitating business development 
and enhancing quality of life. Planning Authorities should support a 
wide range of economic activity in rural areas and seek environmental 
enhancement through development at every opportunity. 

Regional Planning Policy 

7. Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire Structure Plan 2001-2016 (NEST), 
Policy 3 (Other Employment Opportunities) advises that proposed 
employment uses on unallocated sites shall be considered acceptable 
providing they respect relevant structure and local plan policies and 
reasonable account is taken of certain criteria. These include; the 
proposal being well integrated with the existing pattern of land use and 
not adversely affecting the amenity of neighbouring land uses; the need 
for access and infrastructure; the proposal making use of derelict, 
unused and under used land or buildings; and the proposal 
demonstrating a proven economic need. Policy 19 (Wildlife, 
Landscape and Land Resources), states that development which 
would have an adverse effect on International or National designations 
shall only be permitted where there are no alternative solutions, or 
there are imperative reasons of over-riding public or national interest. 
Development that will have adverse effects on an Area of Landscape 
Significance will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated that 
any damaging impact is considered acceptable overall or there is a 
public interest which outweighs the conservation interest. Policy 20 
(Built Heritage), states that the built heritage of the north east will be 
conserved and promoted as a valuable resource. As such protection is 
given to the integrity and setting of Listed Buildings. 

Local Planning Policy 

8. The Finalised Aberdeenshire Local Plan, Policy Env\1 
(International Nature Conservation Sites) states that development 
likely to have a significant impact on a site designated as a Special 
Area of Conservation (SAC) and not directly connected with or 
necessary to the conservation management of the site, must be the 
subject of an Appropriate Assessment. It will only be permitted where 
the Appropriate Assessment indicates that it will not adversely affect 
the integrity of the site; or there are no alternative solutions; or there 
are imperative reasons of over-riding public interest. Policy Env\5 
(Areas of Landscape Significance) states that development within an 
Area of Landscape Significance will not be permitted where its scale, 
location or design will detract from the quality or character of the 
landscape. In all cases the highest standard of design will be required. 
Within the Cairngorms National Park greater weight will be given to the 
conservation and enhancement of the natural and cultural heritage of 
the area where there is conflict between the aims. Policy Env\18 
(Listed Buildings) states that all listed buildings will be protected 
against works which would have a detrimental effect on their listed 
character, integrity or setting. Policy Emp\3 (Employment 
Development in the Countryside) provides general support for new 
employment development in the countryside subject to meeting certain 
criteria. Policy Inf\4a (Foul Drainage Standards) requires 
developments to be served by public or private infrastructure for foul 
drainage where it is demonstrated that there are no negative impacts 
on amenity, public health, and the environment. Policy Inf\4b 
(Surface Water Drainage Standards) states that development will be 
approved in principle if surface water is dealt with in a sustainable 
manner. Policy Gen\2 (The Layout, Siting and Design of New 
Development), sets out criteria for the layout, siting and design of new 
development and requires it to be in accordance with the guidance 
contained in Appendix 1(The Design of New Development in 
Aberdeenshire). 

National Park Policy 

9. For information purposes only, the recently published Draft 
Cairngorms National Park Plan: Priorities for Action 2007-2012 
sets out 7 priorities for the National Park. One of these is “Conserving 
and Enhancing the Park’s Biodiversity and Landscapes”. Work within 
this priority includes enhancing the Park’s landscapes, identifying and 
enhancing habitat networks, enhancing the condition of designated 
sites within networks, and protecting biodiversity. Another priority is 
“Making Tourism and Businesses Sustainable”. Work within this 
priority includes supporting strong businesses with high quality 
standards, managing the impacts of tourism and business, improving 
environmental performance, and supporting entrepreneurship and 
business development. Please note the Draft Park Plan is not a 
land use development plan and carries no material weight at this 
stage. 

10. For information purposes only, in the Consultative Draft 
Cairngorms National Park Local Plan, the site lies within a General 
Policy 1 area. This states that development will be permitted if it is 
unlikely to have a significant adverse effect on the aims of the National 
Park or any of its special qualities. Policy 4 (Landscape) states that 
development that is likely to have an adverse impact on the special 
landscape qualities of the National Park including, landscape character; 
scenic qualities; natural beauty; amenity; historic landscape elements; 
cultural components; or wild land character, will not be permitted. 
Policy 6 (Listed Buildings) states that development that would affect 
a Listed Building or its setting will only be permitted where it is 
demonstrated that the proposals seek to preserve the building, its 
setting and any features of special architectural or historic interest. 
Policy 35 (Proposals for Business & Economic Development) 
advises that outwith settlements proposals for business development 
will be favourably considered where they are for a specific operation 
relative to that site, or where no suitable sites are available within 
settlements. Business proposals should maintain and enhance the 
vitality and viability of the local community, local business centre 
(where appropriate) and the local economy of the Park. 


CONSULTATIONS 

11. Aberdeenshire Council Transportation and Infrastructure Service. 
They have advised that the layout of accesses at the location is not 
ideal but given the topography of the site and the B976 no practical 
improvement is possible. The proposed development will not 
significantly increase vehicle movements and should not be detrimental 
to the surrounding public road network. They therefore have no 
objections to the proposal. 

12. Aberdeenshire Council Principal Environmental Health Officer. He 
has no observations. 

13. CNPA Economic and Social Development Group. They have stated 
that Ballater is an area heavily dependent on tourism, and the 
diversification of non-tourism businesses should be welcomed. 
Manufacturing businesses are relatively rare in the east of the Park and 
offer alternative employment opportunities to those offered by tourism 
businesses. The expansion of this business will also help mitigate any 
future adverse impacts on the area if disasters such as 9/11 or Foot 
and Mouth disease are repeated. From previous unrelated discussions 
with the owner the expansion of the bottling plant is likely to help 
safeguard existing jobs and create new ones. The application adds to 
existing buildings immediately adjacent to a quiet section of road 
across the Dee River from Ballater with the only neighbouring business 
being a hotel. It is unlikely that there will be a negative affect on 
existing businesses in the area. There is likely to be a rise in traffic 
movements, but the A93 is only 1 mile away from the site. Deeside 
Water is an increasingly well known brand of bottled water and is 
distributed throughout major supermarkets in Scotland. It is a “Green” 
business making good, sustainable use of local resources. They 
therefore welcome the proposal. 

14. SEPA. It is proposed to drain foul water to a new septic tank and 
soakaway positioned below the proposed building on the north side. 
Trial pits and percolation tests were carried out at the time of the 
previous application in 2002. The applicant’s agent has advised that 
whilst the location and size of the proposed building has now changed, 
the location of the soakaway has remained the same. SEPA accepted 
the proposals previously and they have now confirmed that they have 
no objections to the current foul water proposals. In relation to surface 
water proposals, SEPA have requested further details. They note that 
as soil conditions on site appear to be suitable for infiltration, the 
applicant could consider draining surface water to a soakaway via a 
partial soakaway to an adjacent watercourse. A Drainage Impact 
Assessment has been submitted which proposes a partial soakaway 
with overflow to the burn the size of which is calculated on the surface 
water discharge area of the roof of the proposed building. This has 
been found to be acceptable. 

15. Aberdeenshire Council Natural Heritage Planner. She advises that 
the extension will not result in a significant loss of trees or habitat. The 
main issue is one of visibility and landscape impact. If the proposal is 
acceptable in other respects additional planting to the north and east 
using predominantly Scots Pine, would soften the impact in time. From 
the south and east the existing backdrop of trees should be sufficient 
provided the colour finish is suitable. 

16. SNH. Initially they objected on the basis that there was insufficient 
information to ascertain if there is likely to be a significant effect on the 
interests of the adjacent River Dee SAC. They stated that there is a 
risk of silt entering the stream 4m to the west of the site during the 
construction phase. This stream flows into the River Dee SAC and 
siltation may have an effect upon salmon and freshwater pearl mussel. 
In this respect they advised that a construction method statement be 
submitted. In addition, they also raised an objection about the potential 
negative landscape and visual impacts of the proposal. This was 
taking account of its sensitive location within the National Park and 
where it is visible from the nearby hotel, South Deeside Road and the 
A93 tourist route. They viewed the design of the proposed storage 
building as not in keeping with the size and character of the existing 
building. They suggested amendments, such as lowering the height, 
use of pitched roofs, details of colour, and landscaping. They also 
suggested that any trees to be felled be surveyed for nesting birds and 
that consideration be given to incorporating nest boxes into the design 
of the building. 

17. SNH continued. Following the submission of a construction method 
statement, they advise that the CNPA are required to undertake an 
Appropriate Assessment of the implications of the proposal for the site, 
in light of the submitted information. They state that if the CNPA’s 
Appropriate Assessment concludes that there will be no adverse 
impact on the integrity of the SAC, their objection can be 
considered to be withdrawn (see Para. 18. below). In addition, on 
receipt of the amended drawings, they have withdrawn their objection 
on potential negative landscape and visual impacts. However, they 
state that they remain concerned by some aspects of the design – size 
and bulk of the storage unit in relation to the existing building, and the 
colour. They suggest that further consideration be given to removing 
the section through which vehicles will be driven. 

18. CNPA Natural Heritage Group. Their initial response advised that 
they had concerns about the detail of the proposal but not the principle. 
Their comments on the potential impact on the River Dee SAC during 
construction coincided with those of SNH. They felt that there is 
potential for significant quantities of silt and other sediment to be 
released into the adjacent burn because of the proposal’s proximity to 
the tributary. They agreed that it was necessary for an Appropriate 
Assessment to be carried out by the CNPA and sought further 
information in relation to construction methods. In terms of landscape 
impact, the NHG advised that they welcomed moves to replace existing 
external storage areas which are unsightly and highly visible. 
However, they agreed that the proposal could have negative landscape 
and visual impacts and that design alternatives should be examined. 
They also suggested that further landscaping opportunities be 
promoted. 

19. CNPA Natural Heritage Group continued. Following the submission 
of the construction method statement, the NHG have carried out an 
Appropriate Assessment. This assessment concludes there may be 
effects on fresh water pearl mussel and salmon but not otter. The 
construction method statement provides information on precautionary 
actions to reduce the risks of silt and pollutants getting into the adjacent 
burn and the River Dee. It covers matters such construction traffic and 
storage of materials being restricted to specific areas, the erection of 
fencing and placing of straw bales to provide barriers, delivery of bulk 
concrete ready mixed and the mixing of concrete at specific locations 
on site, storage of sand/cement under cover, and the imposition of 
these requirements in the contractors tender documents. The 
conclusion is that provided these measures are incorporated into 
appropriate conditions and properly followed, there will be no 
adverse impact on the qualifying features or the site integrity of 
the SAC. On this basis, the objection from SNH detailed in 
paragraphs 15 & 16 above is now withdrawn. In addition, the 
CNPA’s Landscape Advisor has added some comments about the 
submitted landscape plan. He suggests that some amendments to the 
plan, in terms of proposed tree species and positioning, would help 
make the plan more successful. 


REPRESENTATIONS 

20. The application was advertised by Aberdeenshire Council as a 
“Proposal Affecting the Character and Setting of a Listed Building”. No 
representations have been received. 


APPRAISAL 

21. The issues that this proposal raise include the principle of the 
development in relation to planning policy, the impact of the 
development on natural heritage designations, and the balance of 
design, landscape and visual impacts against economic and business 
development. 

Principle of Development in Relation to Planning Policy 

22. The site lies in a countryside area. Business, industrial or employment 
related proposals within such areas need to be carefully considered in 
terms of their appropriateness in such rural locations. Planning policy 
contained in the Structure and Local Plans for the area require certain 
criteria to be met but there is general support for this form of 
development. National planning policy, as encompassed in SPP15 
(Rural Development) recognises the importance of economic activity to 
sustaining countryside areas, including those not traditionally related to 
land management or tourism. Clearly though, large scale industrial or 
business development may not be appropriate where it would have 
significant adverse impacts. In such cases, locations on existing 
industrial or business parks within or near to main settlements, and 
close to major transport corridors is clearly considered to be the most 
appropriate option. 

23. In this instance, I would not describe the applicants business as of such 
a significant scale, even with the proposed expansion, that it needs to 
be located on an industrial estate within a settlement. However, of 
more relevance is the fact that the business is reliant on a natural 
resource which is specific to this rural location. Part of the success of 
the business seems to be that the water produced is bottled at source. 
The Deeside Water Company has been in operation since 1998 at this 
location and the fact that they sought permission for an additional 
building back in 2001 and are now wishing to pursue an alternative 
expansion option, which includes additional employment opportunities 
makes it clear that the business is successful and continues to thrive. 
It has been described, by the CNPA’s Economic Development Officer, 
as a “Green” business making good, sustainable use of local 
resources. In this respect therefore, it would seem entirely logical but 
also supportable to agree the principle of retaining and expanding this 
business in this rural location. In principle, it would not cause any 
conflict with planning policy. 

Impact on Natural Heritage Designations 

24. As discussed in the consultation section of this report, the site lies 
immediately adjacent to a stream which is designated as part of the 
River Dee Special Area of Conservation (SAC). There has been 
concern from SNH and the CNPA’s Natural Heritage Group about the 
potential impact of construction works on the adjacent watercourse. 
However, following the submission of the construction method 
statement, and the completion of the required Appropriate Assessment, 
the conclusion is that provided the methods stated in the construction 
statement are implemented, there will be no adverse impact on the 
qualifying interests or the integrity of the SAC. SNH no longer have an 
objection. In this way, the proposal complies with planning policy in 
relation to conservation of natural heritage interests. 

Design, Landscape and Visual Impacts and Economic Development 

25. The issues surrounding building design and potential landscape and 
visual impacts, in my mind, are the most important considerations in 
this instance. 

26. The starting off point is the existence of the previous permission. 
Having been granted in February 2002, on a standard time condition of 
5 years, it remains extant. It could still therefore be implemented. This 
permission granted the construction of a much larger but detached 
building built off the slope on the north side and which extended in front 
of the existing building and further eastwards towards the more open 
area closer to the hotel. The current proposal is considerably smaller 
in floor area, width, length and bulk and although located further up the 
slope it would be of the same height as the previous one in relation to 
the height of the existing building. To help compare the two proposals, 
a sectional drawing through the site, indicating both proposals, was 
requested and subsequently received. A copy of this is attached to 
this report as Fig. 4. My opinion is that, because of the considerable 
reduction in size, when viewed from across the valley to the north 
(A93), the new proposal, will have less of an overall impact than the 
previous one. 

27. Following on from this though, consideration has to be given to the 
impact of the proposed building when viewed from the approaches 
along the S. Deeside Road. Like some of the consultees, I have been 
concerned about the visual impact of the new structure from this side 
but also, its compatibility in terms of size, scale, and design, with the 
existing traditional former steading building. At my request, sketch 
perspective and 3 dimensional drawings (axonometric) have been 
submitted. The axonometric drawing is attached to the report as 
Fig. 5. The original scheme showed the new building “abutting” the 
existing building with a vertical wall. I took the view that this 
accentuated the differences in size, scale and type between the two 
structures and that it would be of benefit, from a design point of view, to 
separate them. However, following further discussions, and an 
explanation of the functional requirements of the new building, and the 
constraints of the site, an amended design was submitted. This did not 
separate the buildings but changed the roof configuration where it 
adjoins the existing building. There was also the introduction of some 
timber cladding. It was made clear that there is a need to allow 
vehicular access through the site for HGVs and that there is a 
requirement for a minimum of 5m on either side for forklift access. By 
the nature of the material of the bottles they require to be stored under 
cover and the process of unloading empty packs of bottles and loading 
pallets of filled bottles also requires to be covered. These operational 
requirements, along with the restricted amount of useable space for 
manoeuvring on the site (because of the slope), have resulted in the 
requirement to link the two buildings and their internal processes. 

28. There is no doubt that the structure proposed is of a functional, 
industrial character, appearance, and scale and is considerably 
different to that of the existing building. However, having accepted that 
the principle of expansion is supportable in policy and locational terms, 
taking account of the difficulties of the site, the operational and 
functional requirements, and the viability in terms of cost of 
alternatives, I take the view that a degree of incompatibility between the 
existing building and the proposed building is inevitable. The 
amendments to the design have helped reduce concerns in this respect 
and the fact that the proposal will allow for the removal of the need for 
unsightly external storage of materials and products, and the 
inappropriate siting and usage of lorry trailers must also be considered. 
While I accept that there are still some negatives in terms of the impact 
of the proposal on the character of the existing traditional building and 
therefore on the cultural heritage of the area, I feel this has to be 
balanced with the potential adverse impact of finding the proposal 
unacceptable, on the ability of the business to further fulfil its economic 
potential. I do not feel that any adverse impacts created in this regard 
are so significant that they should outweigh the potential economic 
benefits that permitting the proposal will allow. 

29. Looking at further issues, the use of colours is important, and I feel that 
provided the colours are appropriate, the two tone walls, will provide 
some mitigation. Samples of colours can be conditioned. In addition, 
while the applicant’s agent has provided some details of new tree 
planting in areas surrounding the new building, the CNPA’s Landscape 
Advisor has asked that modifications be made to help mitigate further 
perceived landscape impacts. Again this can be conditioned. In terms 
of impact on the setting of the adjacent Listed hotel, the proposal is 
now located further away than the previous proposal (now a distance of 
over 60 metres). From the A93, views of the hotel will still be 
unobstructed and being at a higher level than the proposal, I do not feel 
that there will be a significant adverse impact on the setting of this 
Listed Building. No objections have been received in this regard. 

Conclusion 

30. Taking account of all the factors, including the previous 
permission, I find that the benefits of the proposal in terms of 
supporting a successful and well known business in this part of 
the National Park and beyond, outweigh any continued concerns 
about visual impact of the design. It is accepted that there are 
some negatives in this regard but I do not believe that these are of 
such significance or represent departures from planning policy, to 
recommend anything other than conditional approval. 


IMPLICATIONS FOR THE AIMS OF THE NATIONAL PARK 

Conserve and Enhance the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Area 

31. It is accepted that there are some negatives in terms of the impact of 
the development on the natural and in particular cultural heritage of the 
area. However, other factors require to be taken into account. 

Promote Sustainable Use of Natural Resources 

32. The business is reliant on the use and promotion of a natural resource 
in this specific part of the National Park. I view the proposal is 
generally positive in terms of this aim. 

Promote Understanding and Enjoyment of the Area 

33. There are no direct implications for this aim. 

Promote Sustainable Economic and Social Development of the Area 

34. The proposal involves the expansion of an existing thriving business on 
Deeside. It will help the business meet the requirements demanded by 
potential customers and it will allow for additional local employment 
opportunities. The proposal is positive in terms of this aim. 


RECOMMENDATION 

35. That Members of the Committee support a recommendation to: 

Grant Full Planning Permission for the Erection of Water Bottling 
Storage Building at Deeside Water Company Ltd. Pannanich 
Wells, Ballater, subject to the following conditions; 

1. The development to which this permission relates must be begun 
within five years from the date of this permission. 

2. Notwithstanding the details submitted the landscaping and tree 
planting proposals are hereby not approved. Prior to the 
commencement of works on site, a modified scheme for the 
landscaping and tree planting on the site shall be submitted for 
the further written approval of the CNPA acting as Planning 
Authority. 

3. The development shall be landscaped and maintained in 
accordance with the scheme approved under Condition No. 2 as 
follows:- 

a. Completion of the scheme during the first planting season 
following the completion of the development, or such other 
date as may be approved in writing with the CNPA acting as 
Planning Authority. 

b. The maintenance of the landscaped areas in perpetuity in 
accordance with the detailed maintenance schedule/table. 
Any trees or shrubs removed, or which in the opinion of the 
CNPA acting as Planning Authority, are dying, being 
severely damaged or becoming seriously diseased within 
five years of planting, shall be replaced by trees or shrubs 
of similar size and species to those originally required to be 
planted. 

4. The construction of the development hereby approved shall be 
carried out strictly in accordance with the procedures stated in 
the method statements (Prevention of Construction 
Contamination of Watercourse & Prevention of Silt Contamination 
of Existing Watercourse) submitted by the Grampian Design 
Associates dated 25/04/06. 

5. In addition to the requirements of Condition No. 4, on completion 
of the works and prior to the removal of the straw bales, any soil 
or other material washed against the bales, shall be removed 
using hand tools and disposed of thereafter away from the 
adjacent watercourse. This requirement shall be added to the 
method statements and included in the pre-tender contractor 
documents. 

6. That the method of on-site disposal of surface water and foul 
water drainage shall be implemented and maintained in 
accordance with the details provided in the submitted Drainage 
Impact Assessment dated 20/03/06 (McAdam Design Partnership). 

7. That prior to the commencement of works on site, exact details 
and specifications, by way of samples, of the proposed external 
finishing materials and their colours, shall be submitted for the 
further written approval of the CNPA acting as Planning Authority. 

8. Following completion and occupation of the development hereby 
approved, no external storage of products and materials 
associated with the business operation, or any siting of lorry 
trailers, shall be permitted outwith either of the buildings. 

9. That unless otherwise agreed in writing with the CNPA acting as 
Planning Authority, no external lighting on the building hereby 
approved shall be permitted. 

10. That prior to the commencement of any works to fell any trees on 
the site to allow the construction of the building hereby approved, 
if felling is carried out during the bird breeding season, the trees 
shall be surveyed for nesting birds. If any active nests are found, 
then no felling shall take place until such time as the CNPA acting 
as Planning Authority and SNH have been consulted and a 
method for felling and mitigation has been agreed. 


Neil Stewart 
25 May 2006 

planning@cairngorms.co.uk 

The map on the first page of this report has been produced to aid in the statutory process of dealing with planning 
applications. The map is to help identify the site and its surroundings and to aid Planning Officers, Committee 
Members and the Public in the determination of the proposal. Maps shown in the Planning Committee Report can 
only be used for the purposes of the Planning Committee. Any other use risks infringing Crown Copyright and may 
lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Maps produced within this Planning Committee Report can only be 
reproduced with the express permission of the Cairngorms National Park Authority and other Copyright holders. This 
permission must be granted in advance.